Showing posts with label Jia Zhang-ke. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jia Zhang-ke. Show all posts

Friday, June 11, 2010

A Video and Graphic for the Day, To Close Out the Week

EAST BRUNSWICK, N.J.—To close out this more-active-than-usual week here at My Life, at 24 Frames Per Second, I offer you all a video and and a graphic for the day.

***



The video above is a so-funny-it-hurts satire, via the Upright Citizens Brigade, of the ignorance and incompetence of the global-energy company BP in the ongoing oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, one that weeks ago surpassed the 1989 Exxon Valdez disaster to become the worst in U.S. history, causing massive environmental damage and overturning untold numbers of lives. It is a terrible, outrage-inducing situation, and I hope the right people—as even our own president said on television—get their asses kicked for allowing such a thing to happen in the first place. But who says one can't have a good, cleansing laugh at the expense of the people at fault? As Sheriff Ed Tom Bell says in No Country for Old Men (2007), "I laugh myself sometimes. Not a whole lot else you can do."

So laugh. Enjoy. Just don't forget the grave tragedies the oil spill has caused.


***

On a far lighter note: Who would have thought the Internet Movie Database's list of the top 250 movies of all time, as voted by the site's users, could be turned into...a subway map?


A Frenchman named David Honnorat took IMDb's Top 250 as of June 19th, 2009, and decided to configure it as a subway map with various subway lines signifying the different genres the films span.

So, according to this map, for example: In order to get from The Seven Samurai (1954) to The Departed (2006), you'd have to transfer at The Godfather: Part II (1974). What about getting from Nosferatu (Murnau's 1922 original, of course) to There Will Be Blood (2007)? Gotta transfer at King Kong (the one and only 1933 version)! (Considering the way There Will Be Blood ends, that seems oddly appropriate.) The possibilities, as you can see, are just about endless. Even better, the color-coded map is quite nice to look at. 

When a good friend of mine sent me a link to this at work, I was immediately taken by it; I'm passing this one with the certainty that you all will be, as well. I tip my lost beret to you, M. Honnorat! (Here's a link, by the way, to the site from which this graphic is taken.)

***

And with that, I take leave of this blog for the weekend. It's been a pretty interesting week both in my own life and in My Life, at 24 Frames Per Second. Let's come back here on Monday and do it again.

In the meantime, have a lovely weekend!

And why don't you keep a still frame in mind while you're enjoying yourselves? As a tribute to Jia Zhang-ke, the great Chinese filmmaker who will soon awarded a Leopard of Honor at the upcoming Locarno Film Festival in Switzerland, here's a shot from my favorite film of his, Still Life  (2006):

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Overt and Covert Emotions

EAST BRUNSWICK, N.J.—Once again, I see that I've fallen somewhat behind in reviewing some of the films I've seen in theaters recently. Allow me to play some catch-up, then!

Cop Out (2010; Dir.: Kevin Smith)


The only truly memorable joke in this film comes right at the beginning, as Tracy Morgan, as he is spewing forth a battery of cop-movie homages amidst an interrogation, yells out "Yippee-kayyay, motherfucker!" and Bruce Willis, standing behind the interrogation room's one-way mirror, smirkily intones, "I've never seen that movie before." Get it? Because Bruce Willis played John McClane in all those Die Hard flicks, and he says that exact catchphrase in all of 'em? Get it?

But seriously, folks, everything you need to know about about this overextended, deliberately aimless and mostly lame riff on 1980s action cop dramas—complete with retro Harold Faltermayer synthesizer score, natch—is contained in that one joke, saving you the trouble of actually having to sit through the whole thing. It goes nowhere fast—probably by design (the film is called Cop Out, after all), but just because I can justify it doesn't mean I have to enjoy it. That said: yes, Kevin Smith, I did pay money to sit through this, if that makes you feel better.

Spring in a Small Town (1948; Dir.: Fei Mu)
The Prowler (1951; Dir.: Joseph Losey)


During the recent Jia Zhang-ke retrospective at MoMA, Spring in a Small Town was paired with Jia's 2008 short Cry Me a River, the reason being that Jia has cited the 1948 Chinese classic as his inspiration for that lovely piece. Naturally, pairing them together invited one to consider their similarities—though ultimately, the only significant quality they share is a mood of contemplative regret over relationships not pursued and emotions kept in check. The Jia short condenses that mood into 20 spare, concentrated minutes (and, as a personal bonus, it features, as an exterior location, a canal in Suzhou on which I myself rode when I went to China two years ago), while Fei Mu's film elaborates on it in 93. Neither is any less affecting than the other; what perhaps deepens the experience of Spring in a Small Town is Fei's empathy for his characters. None of the parties involved in the central love triangle are bad people, by any means; it's just that, in spite of the powerful romantic emotions raging inside all of them—especially the female character played exquisitely by Wei Wei—they all feel bound by traditional notions of marriage and friendship to keep their passions under wraps.

The film's compelling seesaw of emotions is captured in a relatively claustrophobic setting—all of the actions take place within one bombed-out-looking village where it seems these people, a grandfather and the woman's husband's sister are its only inhabitants—with a sense of desolate atmosphere and an eye for expressive visual poetry by cinematographer Li Shengwei. But above all, it's the emotional complexity of Spring in a Small Town that may well be its most beautiful quality of all. It's a romantic melodrama with characters as believably rich and multifaceted as you or I.


Webb Garwood, the anti-hero of Joseph Losey's 1951 noir The Prowler, is obviously not what you would immediately consider a "sympathetic" main character—but, as Van Heflin plays him, with uncompromising honesty and menace, one can get an idea of what drives his ruthless behavior through the course of the film. A former basketball star in college, he is now an ordinary cop frustrated with the lack of direction in his life, as he admits to Susan Gilvray (Evelyn Keyes), who herself feels stuck in a passionless marriage. Thinking he has found a kindred spirit in Susan, who is married to a disc jockey who says goodnight to her over the airwaves at the end of every episode, Webb begins to fixate on her—and, interestingly, Susan, for a time, reciprocates, though with palpable conflictedness (most likely contributed by those same traditional notions of faithfulness in marriage that highlights Spring in a Small Town). Their relationship takes a slew of twists and turns, from murder to marriage, all concluding with a secret birth conducted in a windy desert in a finale that is as spiritually expressive as the snow-covered second half of Nicholas Ray's On Dangerous Ground (1952).

The Prowler obviously goes far darker and deeper with its characters and their suppressed, forbidden desires than the far more tender-feeling Spring in a Small Town does, but the film similarly operates as a fascinating psychological study of anguished characters locked in an emotional tug-of-war, observed by Losey and cinematographer Arthur C. Miller with a surfeit of beautifully wrought long takes. Webb Garwood ultimately gets his in the end (admittedly maybe more of a Hays Code-acceptable type of ending than anything else), but he remains a memorably convincing movie rake, one who disturbs precisely because his desires are, in many ways, universal: a desire to break out of a dead-end life, to move up in class, and the like. You almost want to see him get away with it all, in spite of your better judgment. Ah, film noir: making us contemplate the moral abysses underneath us all!

There's much more to say about this classic film noir...and film critic/video essayist Matt Zoller Seitz offers more food for thought here:



(Spring in a Small Town only available in an out-of-print Cinema Epoch DVD that apparently contains a print of poor quality. Cry Me a River is available as an extra on Cinema Guild's DVD of Jia's most recent feature, 24 City. And The Prowler is unavailable on Region 1 DVD at the moment.)

Hot Tub Time Machine (2010; Dir.: Steve Pink)


Yes, Hot Tub Time Machine more or less reconfigures elements from last year's big comedy hit The Hangover—right down to its scene-stealing third wheel (Zach Galifianakis in The Hangover, Rob Corddry here)—into an '80s nostalgia trip. But I enjoyed this more than The Hangover, a movie that never quite delivered on the delirious craziness its situations promised (and which wasted Mike Tyson to boot). Hot Tub Time Machine, a messier, less carefully structured movie, does eventually work up a steam of comic insanity that explodes at the end in ways that are often more inspired than anything in The Hangover. And, as A.O. Scott eloquently elucidated in his New York Times review of the film, there is a welcome undercurrent of bitter regret, played with conviction by the central quartet of actors, that actually creates some genuine emotional stakes for these seemingly washed-up characters. Hot Tub Time Machine eventually becomes almost poignant in its riotous consideration of middle-age disappointment. That's certainly more than Todd Phillips & co. even attempted for The Hangover.

Le Cercle Rouge (1970; Dir.: Jean-Pierre Melville)


[POSSIBLE SPOILERS AHEAD]

More adventures in repertory cinema, this time with a Jean-Pierre Melville film I had never seen until three weeks ago at IFC Center. The legendary French New Wave director's spare, beautifully controlled late style—so concentrated, graceful and trance-like—is familiar, but this time his subject isn't one criminal's elusive inner life, as in his 1967 masterpiece Le Samouraï. Le Cercle Rouge's canvas is broader: a consideration of the criminal lifestyle as a whole.

It's telling that the final shot of Le Cercle Rouge is not of any of the criminals (Alain Delon and Gian Maria Volonte playing the two main thieves) involved in the film's justifiably celebrated central jewel heist, but of Mattei (André Bourvil), the police commissioner who is tasked to find and capture these criminals after one of them escapes from his grasp in the film's opening minutes. For me, the character of Mattei—not a major character, but a pivotal marginal one who is palpably unsettled as he is by his superior's authoritatively intoned philosophy that "all men are guilty" and that "They're born innocent, but it doesn't last"—holds the key to the picture's moral depths What drives these criminals to maintain that dangerous lifestyle, even after they have been punished by law for it? Is that possibly the only life they know? Or does something else—most vividly, the possibility of redemption, in the case of tortured former sharpshooter Jansen (Yves Montand)—keep them in the game? Melville, expressing his characters' guarded reticence through his breathtakingly cool style, keeps their motives intriguingly mysterious—but the police chief's misanthropy, and Mattei's troubled reactions to his investigation and whether they validate that point-of-view, casts a mournful pall over the whole film. Even at the end, as the criminals are gunned down by the police, the last shot is a close-up of Mattei's face walking around the crime scene, looking visibly shaken at the wasted lives that have just been taken.

If Le Samouraï was an intimately scaled meditation on a man defined almost exclusively by his actions, Le Cercle Rouge is an epic dirge about men defined almost exclusively by their actions. Amidst the cool gangster poses—and Melville's precise ways of lighting and framing those poses—and his play with noir genre tropes lies a whole troubling moral philosophy. That, of course, is one of the major source of the endless fascination of this master's late gangster pictures.

(Le Cercle Rouge is available on Criterion Collection DVD.)

Friday, March 26, 2010

Big-Screen Mania

EAST BRUNSWICK, N.J.—A funny thing has happened in my moviegoing habits recently: I've begun to gravitate more toward revival film screenings, and have started to not make it as much of a priority to keep up with the new releases as I used to.

I guess I have both Jean-Luc Godard and Jia Zhang-ke to thank, or blame, for this. As I wrote here, seeing his great 1964 film Band of Outsiders at the IFC Center was a totally unexpected revelation; sure, I had always loved the film for its charm, playfulness and sense of melancholy, but I had never been deeply moved by the film—especially by the way Godard gives near-mythic size to his utterly ordinary trio of characters—until I saw it projected theatrically. And then the Museum of Modern Art programmed its Jia Zhang-ke retrospective this month, and I experienced two more revelations at screenings of The World (2004) and Platform (2000); I didn't warm to either film on DVD, but somehow I connected with them more readily on a big screen.

In the cases of the Jia films, perhaps familiarity played a part in my more enthusiastic second reactions to those two. Issues that might have bugged me the first time—the off-putting emotional detachment of Platform, the world-as-theme-park metaphor dwarfing human drama in The World—either bothered me less or fell completely apart.


So while Platform still feels somewhat alienating in its distance, what felt like mere dullness on my 42" LCD TV at home came off on the comparably larger dimensions of a movie screen like a profound sense of aimless historical drift, in which 10 years of Chinese modernization, from the late '70s to the early '80s, gradually lead up to a finale which vividly illustrates that familiar saying, "The more things change, the more things stay the same." Certainly, I didn't feel a chill in my spine on TV that I did in the theater with the film's final shot, which, thanks to an impeccably placed musical crescendo on the soundtrack that's almost Pendereckian in impact, powerfully exudes a feeling of dreams dashed, of lives mired in a dead end that the characters barely seem to perceive.


As for The World: Jia still relies a bit too much on his grand metaphor to carry the film forward, but somehow this didn't bother me quite as much this time around. (Having Jia and star Zhao Tao introduce the film certainly didn't hurt the experience, as I briefly documented here.) In fact, I found myself more engaged with the human dramas playing out among the backstage characters, and more intrigued by the film's implications about how globalization and modernization paradoxically cuts people off from the wider world—how, to put it more simply, the world seems to get smaller even as its boundaries expand. It also seemed a funnier movie than I had remembered it on DVD, with Jia finding innumerable fresh and often hilarious ways to stage and frame his characters amidst these world-landmark reproductions. (Maybe the presence of an audience heartily laughing at some of Jia's funnier visual gags enhanced this impression.) Even its much-disputed tragic ending made some kind of instinctive sense to me (though I'm not sure I can really explain why except to say that there is a line of dialogue early in the film that anticipates it).

How could it be that seeing these two films in a theater made them play that much more vividly than seeing them on home video? Maybe only now am I truly realizing just how important high-resolution theatrical projection can be not only for the sake of image detail, but for bringing us closer, physically and spiritually, to characters and ideas. That can especially be important in a Jia film like Platform, in which the director deliberately makes us aware of the (historical) distance between us and his characters by generally eschewing close-ups and choosing medium or wide shots to tell his story. Granted, that feeling of being kept at arm's length might come across in a home-theater set-up—but Jia pays as much attention to detail in his frames as he does to the length of his takes, and the inherent minimization of detail in even the most immaculate set-up is thus automatically doing an injustice to at least one facet of his art.

That, and just seeing a film projected big can be an overwhelming feeling in an of itself, especially with the widest of aspect ratios. This I especially felt with The World—though perhaps a part of that was because I was seated in the second row of the theater. (At theaters like Film Forum and MoMA, I have started to make it a habit to sit as close to the screen as possible—especially at Film Forum, where the screens are relatively small compared to the standard multiplex screen.)

There is another reason that I've begun to crave seeing more older movies in theaters. Simply put: I haven't been able to find enough time to be able to make much progress with my Netflix queue. These past few weekends, I always seem to find myself wrapped up in other practical matters I need to attend to (income taxes being one of them); also, my work schedule makes it so that I pretty much have no time to sit through feature films on DVD in the evenings. All in all, I think it's been almost a month since I last watched a DVD from Netflix. A month! And because I'm often in New York at least one day of my weekends in order to catch up on theatrical releases, I find I can only fit in one DVD a week, if that.

For a cinephile as hungry as I am, that's akin to starvation!

Taking all that into consideration, then: You know what I did this past weekend? Instead of seeing new releases like Bong Joon-ho's Mother, Marco Bellocchio's Vincere or Noah Baumbach's Greenberg, I instead decided to check out Fei Mu's 1948 classic Spring in a Small Town and Joseph Losey's 1951 noir The Prowler, neither of which I had ever seen. They are both wonderful films—the Fei full of beautiful emotional complexities, the Losey rich in human complexities of a far darker, seedier kind—and the feeling of satisfaction at having these first experiences at a theater was, I think, worth the ticket price. (I hope to say more about those films than that, but I'll do so at a later date.)

My reasoning is: Hell, if I'm spending so much time and energy trying to catch up with the latest in art-house theatrical releases, why not go all the way and take in the latest art-house revivals as well? Even with stuff that is technically available on DVD (though admittedly, The Prowler is not)? That's the way the directors intended for their films to be seen anyway, am I right?

Of course, the downside is that I am falling way behind in new releases. Lourdes, The Art of the Steal, the 1980 and '83 installments of the Red Riding trilogy (the '74 episode is gripping and devastating stuff, I must say), Green Zone, the aforementioned Bong, Bellocchio and Baumbach films—all of these as yet unwatched by me. In previous years, this might have vexed me; these days, though, I shrug my shoulders and take them in stride. Hey, I see what I can. (Not everyone can go to free press screenings, you know.)

So now, I open it up to all you fine readers of this here blog: Have you been left cold by a film on home video only to find that seeing it theatrically opened your eyes, or maybe even made you dislike it even more? Has the inverse happened? Has a theatrical experience made you do a complete 180 on a film? Above all, though: Am I crazy for choosing to pay to see older films in theaters rather than sticking to new releases? (You can tell me I'm crazy. I can take it.)

Sunday, March 07, 2010

Jia Zhang-ke and Zhao Tao In The House!

EAST BRUNSWICK, N.J.—I had initially planned to finally take in Jia Zhang-ke's Platform (2000) on the big screen at the Museum of Modern Art this afternoon before heading over to an Oscar party in Park Slope tonight. But then, I took a look at the size of the bags I would have to carry all around New York before going to this party—a backpack, a bag of clothes for work tomorrow (I'm planning to sleep over my host's pad) and most likely a bag of some kind of food (it's a potluck)—and decided it'd be much easier to just go straight from New Brunswick to Park Slope. Thankfully, MoMA is showing Platform again on Saturday, so I'll plan accordingly.

The big draw for going to see it this particular afternoon would have been to see Jia in person and hear him introduce the film. I'll be missing him, alas...but no big deal, because I already saw him: on Friday night, with his leading lady Zhao Tao, introducing The World (2004)! I even took a couple of snaps with my pocket-size Canon PowerShot SD400:

 
 
Pictured in both: Jia, middle, and Zhao Tao, right, still sporting that short hairstyle from 24 City

According to Jia, he was sporting those glasses as protection for his eyes, having strained it after long hours editing. Too bad...and yet, who knew that Jia could do a mean Wong Kar-Wai impression?

 

I have more to say about The World itself, but I'll save a more detailed consideration for another post. For now, I will say that my suspicions were confirmed: I found the film considerably more engaging on a big screen than I did watching it on my 42" LCD TV at home. It still may not quite challenge Still Life (2006) as my favorite of his features (sans Xiao Wu (1997), which I haven't yet seen), but it seems a lot richer, funnier, more beautiful and more affecting than it did the first time. Here's hoping for a similar revelation with Platform Saturday!

Thursday, March 04, 2010

A Distant Voice, But Not a Still Life

NEW YORK—


Starting tomorrow night, the Museum of Modern Art will be running a retrospective of the films of the highly acclaimed sixth-generation Chinese filmmaker Jia Zhang-ke. In my latest contribution to The Wall Street Journal's Speakeasy blog, I briefly discuss some of Jia's long-running thematic interests and filmmaking style, and then offer brief descriptions of some of his films. I wish I had been allowed to attempt something more critical in nature...but hey, the Journal already has its film critic—one who has, to his credit, lavished praise on Jia's recent work (putting Still Life—still my favorite film of his, by far—on his 2008 ten-best list, for one thing). So I guess this is the next best thing—anything to shine a light on arguably the most important filmmaker of the past decade.

As I note in the article, Jia is supposed to be in New York throughout this weekend, introducing the films being screened at MoMA. Tomorrow night, he and his leading lady, Zhao Tao, will be introducing tomorrow's opening-night feature, his 2004 sci-fi film/globalization parable The World. I aim to be there, and I also will perhaps try to see his 2001 epic Platform Sunday afternoon (just before the Oscars, natch). Truth be told, both Platform and The World are films I admire more than actually love—so, at the very least, this retrospective will offer me a chance to see them projected theatrically, to see if I warm to them more on a big screen.

You can see details about the MoMA series here.